Jump to content

mbert

Members
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thank you, that sounds really promising! There is no hurry for me now anyway, but now I know what I need to watch. The Pro1 is a very interesting device (though I would really prefer a classical slider like the BlackBerry PRIV), and being able to have an eye on update policy etc. in the meantime is a good thing anyway before spending a larger amount of money on the next handset.
  2. Thank you for your reply. That won't be necessary. For cyrillic layouts there are two standards: the national layouts that don't have much to do with 'qwerty' (that's what is usually used for on-screen keyboards), and the so-called 'phonetic' layouts where the cyrillic characters are matched to a 'qwerty' layout as good as is possible. That's the most natural choice when you have a hardware keyboard with latin character set. For Russian and Ukrainian this is usually called 'yasherty' (яшерты / яшерти), and you'll have 'a' on 'a', 'с' on 's', 'д' on 'd' and so forth. When I got m
  3. As BlackBerry's future engagement on the device market is highly doubtful, my current device will probably have reached end of life by the end of this year. While I am still almost perfectly happy with it I am already looking out for a possible successor. And while an all-touch device might even be a possible choice, the Pro1 has attracted my attention. Having also backed (and then immediately sold) the Unihertz Titan I have started understanding that a physical keyboard alone is by far not enough to be productive and happy with one's device. The software is as important. And since there
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms