Rob. S. 1,647 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 Seems the mail server tried for five days: Reporting-MTA: dns; [my mail hoster's mail server hostname] X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 574E8142591 X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [my mail address] Arrival-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:25:45 +0100 (CET) Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected] Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected] Action: failed Status: 4.4.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; connect to fxtec.co.uk[50.63.202.57]:25: Connection timed out Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VaZso 1,997 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 Have you sent that e-mail using fxtec.com ending? Just because it seems they have tried to deliver it with fxtec.co.uk address. Also, you may try to write them through their website: here 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kashif 350 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Rob. S. said: Seems the mail server tried for five days: Reporting-MTA: dns; [my mail hoster's mail server hostname] X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 574E8142591 X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [my mail address] Arrival-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:25:45 +0100 (CET) Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected] Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected] Action: failed Status: 4.4.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; connect to fxtec.co.uk[50.63.202.57]:25: Connection timed out Well ive always been using .com Edited November 19, 2019 by kashif update Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VaZso 1,997 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 1 minute ago, kashif said: Well ive always been... I suggest you to edit the e-mail address because SPAM robots like to collect these addresses and more spam ("noise") may be experienced at recipient side with higher risk of filtering out valid e-mails. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kashif 350 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, VaZso said: I suggest you to edit the e-mail address because SPAM robots like to collect these addresses and more spam ("noise") may be experienced at recipient side with higher risk of filtering out valid e-mails. Thanks @VaZso, sorry i didnt realized that. I have edited. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob. S. 1,647 Posted November 19, 2019 Author Share Posted November 19, 2019 Thanks, the .com address worked (I had copied the .co.uk address from a posting somewhere in this forum, so I though it would be legit)! I got an answer in less than 20 minutes, which is exceptionally fast. (I don't think I can share what they wrote, but it was nothing earth-shattering anyway.) 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.