Jump to content

Benchmark Pro¹ vs Pro¹X


Recommended Posts

All I can say up to now is that the raw GPU performance of the Pro1-X is indeed much lower than the Pro1's. In Super Tux Kart (love that game!) the X reaches somewhat less than half the frame rate, given identical graphics settings (top: Pro1, bottom: Pro1-X):

SuperTuxKart_Pro1.thumb.jpg.11f7f53295edc30c69110306a1bc485d.jpgSuperTuxKart_Pro1X.thumb.jpg.7e9d1d8c51704226a89cc20d8bc0e185.jpg

While this is unfortunately quite noticeable in a fast-paced game like that, it of course does not matter much in normal phone use.

In many cases the Pro1-X actually feels faster than the Pro1, e.g. when launching apps, as if the disk-IO was faster. However, that may also be related to Android 11 (on the Pro1-X) being better optimized than my good-old Lineage 16.0 (on the Pro1); or simply due to the fact that, up to now, I have way less stuff installed and running in the background on the Pro1-X compared to the Pro1 (which is my daily).

Once Lineage becomes available, I plan to port my Debian-chroot setup to the X, which should provide me with all the low-level Unix benchmarking tools I'm used to, and allow for a more in-depth comparison of the two devices.

Edited by claude0001
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Name_not_avail said:

Geekbench 5 results on my Pro 1x are here:  https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18809529

The biggest downgrade is the unusable microphone while making LTE voice calls (but to be fair I never had a Pro 1 to compare that problem with).

And https://browser.geekbench.com/search?utf8=✓&q=fxtec provides several tests from PRO1s (aka qx1000 internally), so roughly 1/4 slower, but there are huge variation in the numbers, so hard to say anything really fair.

Search for qx10150 give other Pro1X tests in august, and they match your numbers rather close.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Name_not_avail said:

The biggest downgrade is the unusable microphone while making LTE voice calls

While I believe this problem is real, it has almost certainly nothing to do with the Pro1X's CPU or GPU performance.

Edited by claude0001
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, claude0001 said:

All I can say up to now is that the raw GPU performance of the Pro1-X is indeed much lower than the Pro1's. In Super Tux Kart (love that game!) the X reaches somewhat less than half the frame rate, given identical graphics settings (top: Pro1, bottom: Pro1-X):

I wouldn't put too much importance into the PrawnX frame rate, on the screenshot above you were on for a podium position.  😆🏁

  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms