Leaderboard

An FCC page has been also published yesterday of Pro1-X FCC approval - see here. Pro1's internal name is QX1000 (this is what also included in camera's EXIF info) and Pro1-X's internal name will be QX1050. There is a confidentiality request which tells internal and external photos, test setup photos and user manual will be available after 180 days.

Very interesting. Your link does what I say in both FireFox and Edge on my laptop (which is where I've been reading this forum), but your link works perfectly in FireFox or Fulguris on my Moto phone (Pro1 is still in shop). Have no clue. But not a big deal enough to keep at it. Just puzzling. 🙂

I don't know why it forwards you to QX1000 but it works for me also using my phone. 🙂 I am speaking about this message: So there was a strange behaviour somewhere...

For what it's worth, for me, it doesn't.

My very first message contained link for QX1050 and second was for comparison with QX1000. Right.

So, it's weird. Your interior photographs link takes me to the right place, the QX1050 interior photos under "label and label." But VaZso's link takes me to the QX1000 page, which seems to be the Pro1, If I go to the top bread crumb, FX Technology Limited, I see the QX1050 link with the 2022 date, but when I click on the QX1050 link, I am also taken to the QX1000 page, which is the Pro1. I can't find any link that takes me from the QX1000 page to the page with the interior of the QX1050 that you posted and if I click the QX1050 breadcrumb link on that page, I am back on the QX1000 page.

I haven't checked all documents but you are right - it may be a mistake anyway but it does not really matter I think. 🙂 I wanted to check internal photos anyway... Definitively no. You may also check documents for Pro1 here and I see main PCB and USB board are definitively different. Anyway, it was the unit sent for FCC approval especially for Pro1-X, it should nothing to do with Pro1 (these are completely different units in this aspect).

I have a friend who collects phones and I held his E7 in my hands maybe one or two years ago and I had a feeling its hinge mechanism is very stable although it was his daily driver for several years and it was technically (and also mechanically) still fully functional (it should be in a similar state also now). Anyway, it's mechanism is very similar to Pro1's mechanism and also this was the cause we took a look of that phone by that time and also later we took two Pro1s and this E7 near each other for some comparison. As of Pro1, my phone still has a good hinge mechanism after years of us

I see! Yes, I was of the Nokia Communicator lineage, if you will, the horizontal keyboard. Though, I still use my E90 for notes because it has a solid hinging system, and only thought about the Nokia E7 for about 1/2 hr, as it felt flimsy back then. I only switched to the Nokia N9 when it couldn't connect any more. My sister on the other hand, had been an HP Ipaq user. So, i guess that's of the vertical keyboard type. Her LG was the horizontal type, but I think she's always missed the Ipaq. I guess when it comes to keyboard vs. no keyboard, either vertical or horizontal will do.

It is something like a joke... Basically old communicators used landscape keyboard and also N900 or killed N950 had the same orientation. (There were also some other phones like HTC Kaiser and so on.) However, there is a different approach what also Blackberry has designed, these devices have portrait keyboards. These two perspectives are belong to very different words and people who like landscape keyboards usually do not really like portrait keyboards and vice versa... that is why the direction is wrong.

(lineage-18.1-20220328-nightly-pro1-signed.zip on March 5 security patch installed smoothly using OTA ) ...But the reintroduced (early August 2021) Accessibility / keyboard bug is not (yet?) fixed. The stage after download and install called "Finalising package installation" is surprising slow though)