silversolver 849 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 I've already bought this, for reasons which do not pertain to its camera, but I do wonder if the Pro1 will have the ability to shoot ultra-slow-motion video, say 960fps or so, or if I will end up buying a separate device to do that. Does anyone who already has theirs care to enlighten me? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TeZtdevice 274 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 If some Pro1 users are not quicker, I will test it in the evening. 2 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
glumreaper 144 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 Monitoring this thread... It wouldn't put me off if it didn't, but it's a nice feature if it's there. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Krzysieq 55 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 doesn't even need to be 960fps, but anything in the slo-mo department would be a nice to have for sure Quote Link to post Share on other sites
silversolver 849 Posted November 25, 2019 Author Share Posted November 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Krzysieq said: doesn't even need to be 960fps, but anything in the slo-mo department would be a nice to have for sure For what I'm going to attempt, more FPS is better LOL. Thank you to everyone who offered to do research. I eagerly await the results. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 I have not experimented that much, but at least 1920x1080@120 x 1/4 is possible using Open Camera, that is 480fp FHD 120fps FHD saved as 120/4=30fps 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
netman 1,424 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, EskeRahn said: I have not experimented that much, but at least 1920x1080@120 x 1/4 is possible using Open Camera, that is 480fps FHD coming from not expecting any high frame rate filming bonus, that's pretty awesome 🙂 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kashif 350 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 Just another question on camera how are the micro shots? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
_DW_ 628 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 10 minutes ago, netman said: coming from not expecting any high frame rate filming bonus, that's pretty awesome 🙂 I had the same sort of expectations 🙂 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 A reduced, and crop from full 4:3 macro, Open Camera 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
holter 20 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 58 minutes ago, EskeRahn said: I have not experimented that much, but at least 1920x1080@120 x 1/4 is possible using Open Camera, that is 480fps FHD Does it really record 120Hz or could you just select it in Open Camera? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TeZtdevice 274 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 1 hour ago, EskeRahn said: I have not experimented that much, but at least 1920x1080@120 x 1/4 is possible using Open Camera, that is 480fps FHD Do you have the slow-mo function with the stock app, too? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, TeZtdevice said: Do you have the slow-mo function with the stock app, too? I can not find any slow motion there, but I can find "HFR 120" and "HSR 120", both for FHD (and not for UHD) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TeZtdevice 274 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 5 hours ago, EskeRahn said: I can not find any slow motion there, but I can find "HFR 120" and "HSR 120", both for FHD (and not for UHD) Yes, correct Eske. Slow motion with the app "open camera" and... 1920x1080 120 FPS 0.25 speed 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 25, 2019 Share Posted November 25, 2019 3 hours ago, TeZtdevice said: Yes, correct Eske. Slow motion with the app "open camera" and... 1920x1080 120 FPS 0.25 speed Yeah, but I can not find the 0.25 speed in the Qualcomm app - It could still be there though, me looking in the wrong places.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
silversolver 849 Posted November 26, 2019 Author Share Posted November 26, 2019 5 hours ago, TeZtdevice said: Yes, correct Eske. Slow motion with the app "open camera" and... 1920x1080 120 FPS 0.25 speed Someone care to smash an egg and record it with these settings and upload it for us to see? :) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
elvissteinjr 359 Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 Spare the eggs. Have Eske record a high velocity clack of opening the slider instead, since he has multiple units to do so anyways 1 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
silversolver 849 Posted November 26, 2019 Author Share Posted November 26, 2019 Haha, clack the final sample while recording HFR with the retail unit. Genius. :) 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 7 hours ago, elvissteinjr said: Spare the eggs. Have Eske record a high velocity clack of opening the slider instead, since he has multiple units to do so anyways HFR 120, normal speed and 0.25x OpenCamera https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/share/GboU8LZM8oI32NfVcOvvloqDIrfa2jxWQ6tvSqqpR0W So the 0.25x really just means recording as 120fps and saving as 120fps / 4 = 30fps.... 😥 (And that should be the difference between 120 HFR and 120 HSR in qualcomm's app too) 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
silversolver 849 Posted November 26, 2019 Author Share Posted November 26, 2019 5 hours ago, EskeRahn said: HFR 120, normal speed and 0.25x OpenCamera https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/share/GboU8LZM8oI32NfVcOvvloqDIrfa2jxWQ6tvSqqpR0W So the 0.25x really just means recording as 120fps and saving as 120fps / 4 = 30fps.... 😥 (And that should be the difference between 120 HFR and 120 HSR in qualcomm's app too) Nice clack. :) Watching it in slow motion shows that it is fairly gentle when it reaches the end of its travel, so that gives me high hopes for its durability. 120fps is not going to be fast enough for what I want to do, so now the question becomes Experia XZ2 or RX100markIV? Both do 960FPS.....backup phone or amazing optical zoom? For the my task the optical zoom would be more valuable..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
netman 1,424 Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 20 minutes ago, silversolver said: Nice clack. 🙂 Watching it in slow motion shows that it is fairly gentle when it reaches the end of its travel, so that gives me high hopes for its durability. 120fps is not going to be fast enough for what I want to do, so now the question becomes Experia XZ2 or RX100markIV? Both do 960FPS.....backup phone or amazing optical zoom? For the my task the optical zoom would be more valuable..... I think RX100 will be much more statisfactory in low light performance and picture quality in general... Ain't nothing like a real camera for photo/video. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, netman said: I think RX100 will be much more statisfactory in low light performance and picture quality in general... Ain't nothing like a real camera for photo/video. Yes RX100 is REALLY a great little machine. I chose III over IV, as it has ever so slighter better low light, but poorer video stuff - that I never use. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
silversolver 849 Posted November 26, 2019 Author Share Posted November 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, EskeRahn said: Yes RX100 is REALLY a great little machine. I chose III over IV, as it has ever so slighter better low light, but poorer video stuff - that I never use. Now I remember why when I was initially doing the research I liked the IV over the III. It's been so long I'd forgotten. :O 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
elvissteinjr 359 Posted November 28, 2019 Share Posted November 28, 2019 If we don't have enough frames, why not just make some up? Not a serious alternative, but I find that version still very satisfying to watch, despite the artifacts. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,427 Posted November 28, 2019 Share Posted November 28, 2019 7 hours ago, elvissteinjr said: If we don't have enough frames, why not just make some up? Not a serious alternative, but I find that version still very satisfying to watch, despite the artifacts. Nice, and interestingly the copy of frames is good for the compression, so the resulting video is not huge. 0:20 in it does look a bit odd in the border between the display and the keys. So this only works when things are not moving fast, But could still be used to see details of fluid motion Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.