VaZso 1,997 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Latest update is available here. Quote by FX Technology Mar 24, 2022 • 12:17PM 41 minutes ago Pro1-X March Manufacturing Update Dear Pro1-X backers, Here is a quick update regarding Pro1-X mass manufacturing: Shenzhen is now out of lockdown and the factory reopened for business on Monday. We have also now booked the final assembly slot, ready to begin mass manufacturing your Pro1-X’s! Our staff have been granted permission to travel to work, but only if they have a 48-hour negative Covid pass. As they are still short-staffed, the factory has been undergoing some housekeeping and recruitment procedures to get enough workers ready for mass manufacturing. We have now re-booked our assembly slot. This was originally due to begin on Saturday 26th March, however, new regulations now prohibit working over the weekend. This means that the trial assembly process will officially begin on Monday 28th March. The trial assembly process will help us to detect and resolve potential problems within the assembly line before we begin mass manufacturing. This will also ensure that the end product quality meets our high standards and expectations. Once this has been completed, we will finally be ready for mass manufacturing and shipping! We will send round a further update next week to show you the Pro1-X assembly line and also confirm the final shipping and delivery timeline. Thank you for your continued patience and support. Team Fxtec 🙂 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
zundappchef 92 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 wel i recieved a email from indiegogo about the Pro1 x so im here to rant about how i stil need to get my original pro1 and the pro1 x is me posting a rant about how i want stuff i paid for helpfull naaaah but the indiegogo update aint helpfull either 😅 we all know its gonna be august 2022 uuuh 2023 before they ship Quote Link to post Share on other sites
xman1 3 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Chinese manufacture will only get worse in the future. Everything that can be moved out of that country, the better. Still waiting to see if things start shipping prior to placing an order. Not going to put $900 out there only to have it disappear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jlavi 112 Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 8:34 PM, Rob. S. said: Then again, history is just repeating itself here. If history repeat itself, FXtec starts manufacturing and shipping alright and some people actually report having received their phones. But then before they can finish all the pending phones they have to stop because of Chinese New Year during which a major crisis breaks in China and stops all manufacturing. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob. S. 1,634 Posted March 25, 2022 Author Share Posted March 25, 2022 7 hours ago, jlavi said: If history repeat itself, FXtec starts manufacturing and shipping alright and some people actually report having received their phones. But then before they can finish all the pending phones they have to stop because of Chinese New Year during which a major crisis breaks in China and stops all manufacturing. No, don't say that, please. I was still under the impression that the "before Christmas" that was communicated for my Pro1 in 2019 will at least hold true for 2022!! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pakman 14 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 It has started!!! https://nitter.net/chenliangchen 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob. S. 1,634 Posted March 29, 2022 Author Share Posted March 29, 2022 Quote posted by FX Technology Mar 29, 2022 • 8:25AM PDT Pro1-X Manufacturing Update Dear Pro1-X backers, We have some exciting news for you all - the Pro1-X trial assembly process has officially begun! The team will be continuously monitoring the production process for the rest of the week to identify any potential problems ahead of full-scale mass manufacturing. Watch on Vimeo Watch on Vimeo We can not wait to ramp up production and finally start shipping your Pro1-X's. As always, thank you so much for all of your continued patience and support. Team Fxtec 🙂 Hooray! 🙂 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hook 2,907 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 Very nice to be getting weekly updates this month. 🙂 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VaZso 1,997 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 An FCC page has been also published yesterday of Pro1-X FCC approval - see here. Pro1's internal name is QX1000 (this is what also included in camera's EXIF info) and Pro1-X's internal name will be QX1050. There is a confidentiality request which tells internal and external photos, test setup photos and user manual will be available after 180 days. 2 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,399 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 28 minutes ago, VaZso said: An FCC page has been also published yesterday of Pro1-X FCC approval - see here. Note especially the fourth from the bottom, that despite being called "Label and Label Location" is actually the interior photographs. (the actual label is a bit above on the list) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hook 2,907 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 27 minutes ago, VaZso said: An FCC page has been also published yesterday of Pro1-X FCC approval - see here. Pro1's internal name is QX1000 (this is what also included in camera's EXIF info) and Pro1-X's internal name will be QX1050. There is a confidentiality request which tells internal and external photos, test setup photos and user manual will be available after 180 days. I'm not sure, but all the dates are 2019. Seems to me this is the original Pro1? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,399 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 6 minutes ago, Hook said: I'm not sure, but all the dates are 2019. Seems to me this is the original Pro1? Are you looking at the right link? Some individual parts might be identical, and thus have older dates though. Here an example of a new one. Taken from the header of the first on the list: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VaZso 1,997 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, EskeRahn said: Note especially the fourth from the bottom, that despite being called "Label and Label Location" is actually the interior photographs. (the actual label is a bit above on the list) I haven't checked all documents but you are right - it may be a mistake anyway but it does not really matter I think. 🙂 I wanted to check internal photos anyway... 9 minutes ago, Hook said: I'm not sure, but all the dates are 2019. Seems to me this is the original Pro1? Definitively no. You may also check documents for Pro1 here and I see main PCB and USB board are definitively different. Anyway, it was the unit sent for FCC approval especially for Pro1-X, it should nothing to do with Pro1 (these are completely different units in this aspect). Edited April 1, 2022 by VaZso 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hook 2,907 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 31 minutes ago, EskeRahn said: Are you looking at the right link? Some individual parts might be identical, and thus have older dates though. Here an example of a new one. Taken from the header of the first on the list: So, it's weird. Your interior photographs link takes me to the right place, the QX1050 interior photos under "label and label." But VaZso's link takes me to the QX1000 page, which seems to be the Pro1, If I go to the top bread crumb, FX Technology Limited, I see the QX1050 link with the 2022 date, but when I click on the QX1050 link, I am also taken to the QX1000 page, which is the Pro1. I can't find any link that takes me from the QX1000 page to the page with the interior of the QX1050 that you posted and if I click the QX1050 breadcrumb link on that page, I am back on the QX1000 page. So, I don't know exactly what's going on at my end that is different from your end. And maybe there is a lot of reuse from the QX1000, but I cannot find the uniquely QX1050 links. Upshot, however, in spite of whatever I am doing wrong, I believe QX1000 is the Pro1 and QX1050 is the Pro1x Anyway, good news, and I'll leave it at that. I'm easily confused. 😉 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VaZso 1,997 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 58 minutes ago, Hook said: But VaZso's link takes me to the QX1000 page, My very first message contained link for QX1050 and second was for comparison with QX1000. 59 minutes ago, Hook said: Upshot, however, in spite of whatever I am doing wrong, I believe QX1000 is the Pro1 and QX1050 is the Pro1x Right. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hook 2,907 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 29 minutes ago, VaZso said: My very first message contained link for QX1050 That's the url, but that's not where it takes me. Takes me to the QX1000 page. <shrug> That is, the url https://fccid.io/2AUCLQX1050 forwards me to https://fccid.io/2AUCLQX1000 If it does differently for you, I'm stumped. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob. S. 1,634 Posted April 1, 2022 Author Share Posted April 1, 2022 3 hours ago, Hook said: That's the url, but that's not where it takes me. Takes me to the QX1000 page. <shrug> That is, the url https://fccid.io/2AUCLQX1050 forwards me to https://fccid.io/2AUCLQX1000 If it does differently for you, I'm stumped. For what it's worth, for me, it doesn't. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VaZso 1,997 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 5 hours ago, Hook said: That's the url, but that's not where it takes me. Takes me to the QX1000 page. <shrug> That is, the url https://fccid.io/2AUCLQX1050 forwards me to https://fccid.io/2AUCLQX1000 If it does differently for you, I'm stumped. I don't know why it forwards you to QX1000 but it works for me also using my phone. 🙂 I am speaking about this message: 7 hours ago, VaZso said: An FCC page has been also published yesterday of Pro1-X FCC approval - see here. Pro1's internal name is QX1000 (this is what also included in camera's EXIF info) and Pro1-X's internal name will be QX1050. There is a confidentiality request which tells internal and external photos, test setup photos and user manual will be available after 180 days. So there was a strange behaviour somewhere... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hook 2,907 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 3 minutes ago, VaZso said: I don't know why it forwards you to QX1000 but it works for me also using my phone. 🙂 I am speaking about this message: So there was a strange behaviour somewhere... Very interesting. Your link does what I say in both FireFox and Edge on my laptop (which is where I've been reading this forum), but your link works perfectly in FireFox or Fulguris on my Moto phone (Pro1 is still in shop). Have no clue. But not a big deal enough to keep at it. Just puzzling. 🙂 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob. S. 1,634 Posted April 1, 2022 Author Share Posted April 1, 2022 8 hours ago, EskeRahn said: Note especially the fourth from the bottom, that despite being called "Label and Label Location" is actually the interior photographs. Unfortunately, the battery doesn't seem to add anything new to help us source it as a spare part from somewhere outside Fxtec... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,399 Posted April 2, 2022 Share Posted April 2, 2022 8 hours ago, Rob. S. said: Unfortunately, the battery doesn't seem to add anything new to help us source it as a spare part from somewhere outside Fxtec... ....That was my hope too... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sequestris 710 Posted April 6, 2022 Share Posted April 6, 2022 (edited) So here's the thing. Periodically I send the guys messages just to say hi, wish them Happy New Year, see how their families are doing. I'm nice to them. I treat them like human beings. I contact the guys in China to wish them Happy Lunar New Year and exchange pics of our cats. They are really sweet people. When I ask them a question about shipping dates or updates, it has never taken more than 24 hours to get a reply. I didn't intend to buy another phone but my husband wanted one. But I had happily been loving my phone for a year or so and still continued to keep in touch with them. Why? I needed nothing right? These people are my friends. They are people. They have lives and families. They created this marvelous device that we are all either thrilled to have or anxiously waiting to get our hands on. When I pre-ordered the Pro1 it was February. I received my phone in December (2019). When I changed my mind after I sold it I placed another order on 12/16/19. I received that on 01/28/2020. Edited April 7, 2022 by sequestris 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
claude0001 1,271 Posted April 6, 2022 Share Posted April 6, 2022 (edited) 8 hours ago, sequestris said: These people are my friends. I see and fully support your point that aggressive ranting about F(x)tec, as is popular on the IGG forum, does not help anyone and certainly will not lead to better communication. However, what you are insinuating is also wrong: customers should not need to be "friends" with companies they do business with in order to get support queries answered. Anyway, your "system" is not scalable: if we all had personal ties with the guys at F(x)tec, their mailboxes would be flooded with cat pictures in addition to our user requests. I do not see how that would improve responsiveness ... 😉 Edited April 6, 2022 by claude0001 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EskeRahn 5,399 Posted April 6, 2022 Share Posted April 6, 2022 Next week should be the start of production according to the newest IGG update 🙂 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Fullmetaljacket223 28 Posted April 6, 2022 Share Posted April 6, 2022 8 hours ago, claude0001 said: I see and fully support your point that aggressive ranting about F(x)tec, as is popular on the IGG forum, does not help anyone and certainly will not lead to better communication. However, what you are insinuating is also wrong: customers should not need to be "friends" with companies they do business with in order to get support queries answered. Anyway, your "system" is not scalable: if we all had personal ties with the guys at F(x)tec, their mailboxes would be flooded with cat pictures in addition to our user requests. I do not see how that would improve responsiveness ... 😉 If anybody would actually like to flood my inbox with cat pictures.. I would forever love that! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.