EskeRahn

Welcome. AFAIK there are no official seller of these cases. So you would either have to do it yourself, or see if someone offers to do it for a price. If I remember correctly then somewhere in this long(!) thread there have been posted links to files for a 3D-printed case. I do not know if the link is still active, nor if others have made better cases since.... (Personally I use cheap roughly modified flip cases for a Huawei P20 Pro, see earlier in this thread, or this blog post)

Though this could be useful info for Pro1-users on Ubuntu Touch if the issues are general, I think you might find other fora more suited. This forum is intended for the FxTec Pro1(X). If the issues are specific to Pinephones try their forum. If it is general for Ubuntu Touch, try an Ubuntu forum.

Remember that the percentage is not an a measurement, but an estimate the phone tries to calculate as an educated guess. And if something (here for good reasons) is messing with the charging system, no big surprise that the estimate system gets a bit confused. See the sketch from this ancient post.

I think it will be pure luck if you find one that matches completely. The one that I got on my pre-production unit is quite different from the one on the retail unit. The inner 'frame' that hold the cards might be a standard item, but the curved outer part hardly is. (the left one is retail) So try contacting support to get a spare part.

Maybe I'm a bit pessimistic by nature, but to me what they describe with "As a worst-case scenario...", to me sounds more like "As a more realistic and less optimistic scenario..." - I can certainly think of way worse scenarios than start of shipping within two months, with the damned Covid and Chinese new year as likely obstacles. But happy new year to everyone, none the less. 🎆

pro1disassembly.pdf

I have ONLY seen/heard of this phenomena on AICP and LineageOS, never on the Android stock. So I'm pretty sure that it is the common kernel of the two that got the bug. Lineage (and thus AICP) has added (or uses?) a smart feature for protecting the battery from 'overcharge' (could well be an underlying chipset feature they use?) I'm almost certain that it is a bug in this, that puts the phone in this mode too early under some unknown conditions. The conditions are cleared by a boot, for some time. See my comments on the issue in the AICP thread.

Update to December 29, with December 5 security patch using OTA went smoothly. Known keyboard bug still there (see lineage thread) (The stage after download and install called "Finalising package installation" is surprising slow though - like it is on LineageOS)

(lineage-18.1-20211227-nightly-pro1-signed.zip on December 5 security patch installed smoothly using OTA ) ...But the reintroduced (early August) Accessibility / keyboard bug is not (yet) fixed. The stage after download and install called "Finalising package installation" is surprising slow though)

I'm not sure, but think the max is 15W (QC at higher voltage)

Yes, never trust the rated max output on a charger! Especially if it is an 'unknown' brand. I always use a meter to test, and have seen both way below and quite a bit above the rating. As many in here will know, I also recommend charging at no more than 5W for daily charges. I only use fast charge when I really need it, and not for full charges.

Yup. The keys are just as real as on e.g. the Pro1. They are transparent, and right under them is an e-ink display, I bought one just to have it. I have considered to buy one of the defective ones you can get on ebay for $20 just to take it apart... But shipping and customs would add some $40, so have been too stingy.... Add: Just ordered one anyway.... (See e.g. this for images and a video)

(I took took the liberty to change the thread title to reflect that you solved it 😇 )

Personally I hope for e-ink keys like they had on the "Alias 2" a.k.a. "SCH-U750" Samsung made for Verizon. An ingenious solution, fitting 'any' language or gaming...

For links to various ROMs, see also this

My guess would be that the app checks for physical or virtual keyboard, but are unaware of the new 'mixed' state where half of the display is dedicated for a virtual keyboard, (and thus logically should be treated as a physical). As they assumes a virtual keyboard takes up a substantial portion of the screen layout, they change the input-mode...

Are you on stock android, or some other rom? Du you see the same if you (for test) use the standard keyboard driver, and not Swiftkey? Is it a particular program, or 'any' input field? I use Swiftkey on stock, and do not see this, so I'm almost certain it is a setting somewhere that need to be changed. (the suggestion to de-select swiftkey, to see if it is a setting inside or outside swiftkey we are hunting for...)

Update to December 22, with December 5 security patch using OTA went smoothly. Known keyboard bug still there (see lineage thread) (The stage after download and install called "Finalising package installation" is surprising slow though - like it is on LineageOS)

(lineage-18.1-20211220-nightly-pro1-signed.zip on December 5 security patch installed smoothly using OTA ) ...But the reintroduced (early August) Accessibility / keyboard bug is not (yet) fixed. The stage after download and install called "Finalising package installation" is surprising slow though)

(I admit I adjusted my Danish text, to something that ended sensible, in Google Translate)

Forgot to post it in this thread, but have also seen it, though on AICP. See these two post from the same thread. this and this.

Det duer ikke hvis vi allesammen skriver på vores eget sprog.... I mangel af bedre brug google translate. Jeg har erstattet ovenstående med indhold fra Google translate, så må du tilrette hvis nødvendigt....

Update to December 15, with December 5 security patch using OTA went smoothly. Known keyboard bug still there (see lineage thread) (The stage after download and install called "Finalising package installation" is surprising slow though - like it is on LineageOS)

Ah sorry, I was unclear. I meant that the way they implemented the repairability might have given us a vulnerability, due to less glue than the Elephone-U. Of course it is not the repairability as such.

Does anyone know if the Elephone U is plagued by the same issues? If not, it could be interesting to get a display with an Elephone-frame, to see if we can spot what they have done differently in the mounting, If could well be, like @VaZso suggests, that it is the repairability that has this negative side effect.