Jump to content

LineageOS 19.1 Official Release for Pro1


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DieBruine said:

Today I purposely let it drop to >10%. Hooked it up to several chargers and it started cycling through the voltages (QC). I tried two different BaseUs chargers 65 GaN, two power banks, a Samsung max 9V charger and my regular Unihertz 5V 1.5A charger. Only the non-QC charger is able to charge it. I always suspected the QC-handshake process to be culprit. This seems to confirm it.

 

Interesting that you detected QC charge issues as well, but that is unfortunately an additional bug you found...

I'm not using QC and the bug I see is NOT that it will not draw power. It keeps the phones battery at a stable level. So the attached power DO feed the phone, but without really charging (or discharging) the battery.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It seems that LineageOS 19.1 will be available soon for Pro1: https://www.lineageoslog.com/19.1/pro1   More information: https://lineageos.org/Changelog-26/ (F(x)tec Pro1 mentione

Please let us know if your charging problems change when running LineageOS 19. The official procedure for opening a bug report (at https://wiki.lineageos.org/how-to/bugreport) is still the best way we

Google pay working here with magisk v24.3 for some time already and works on LOS 19.1 too. -Zygisk mode on -Enforce denylist -Put com.google.android.gms and com.google.android.gms.unsta

Posted Images

9 hours ago, DieBruine said:

Today I purposely let it drop to >10%. Hooked it up to several chargers and it started cycling through the voltages (QC). I tried two different BaseUs chargers 65 GaN, two power banks, a Samsung max 9V charger and my regular Unihertz 5V 1.5A charger. Only the non-QC charger is able to charge it. I always suspected the QC-handshake process to be culprit. This seems to confirm it.

Very interesting. Maybe the developers could make something of out this piece of information.

(Unfortunately, with my broken USB connector, QC seems to be the only way left to charge my phone at all.)

Edited by Rob. S.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was charging without any issues for about a month until the charging bug occurred again. When it did last week, after a reboot I was able to charge it, but every time I plugged it in the next time, it wouldn't charge again before a reboot.

I tried to shut it down for about 2 minutes, the problem came back after the next charging cycle. Shut it down for 10 minutes, same thing. But after I shut it down for about 40 minutes, I can charge it for the last few days without an issue.

I too didn't find any pattern on when this occurs, but I was wondering if something in hardware is contributing to this behavior.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, foxfreejack said:

I too didn't find any pattern on when this occurs, but I was wondering if something in hardware is contributing to this behavior.

I doubt it is hardware, as we 'only' have it reported in here for Lineage 18+19 and AICP-R and neither Stock Pie nor Sailfish nor earlier Lineage/AICP.
However it COULD well be that something in Android 11/12 (And thus Lineage 18/19) needs to be set up differently than what it is currently to work correctly with the Pro1, so could well be outside what is changed by the LineageOS implementation.

If we had a plain AOSP 11 or 12, we could see if it has the same problems. BUT as we have not (yet) found a consistent way of triggering the bug, it is really hard to test/debug what is going on.

It is not uncommon outside the Pro1-world... See e.g. some of the top hits from Google:
https://community.phones.nokia.com/discussion/64373
https://support.google.com/pixelphone/thread/69970479/android-11-charging-battery-issue?hl=en
https://www.maketecheasier.com/android-phone-wont-charge/

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/25/2022 at 8:41 AM, EskeRahn said:

(lineage-19.1-20220725-nightly-pro1-signed.zip on July 5 security patch installed smoothly using adb sideload and MindTheGapps-12.1.0-arm64-20220605_174313)

Auto-update kept crashing. So sideload for me together with test version of OG nano. But now it's stuck in a bootloop.

I will try some things out and post an update.

Flashed both slots with recovery, LoS and MtG. Some crash errors, nothing reinstall doesn't fix.

Edited by DieBruine
MtG
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DieBruine said:

Auto-update kept crashing. So sideload for me together with test version of OG nano. But now it's stuck in a bootloop.

I will try some things out and post an update.

Flashed both slots with recovery, LoS and MtG. Some crash errors, nothing reinstall doesn't fix.

OpenGapps only supports up to 11, not 12. So that does not work. You will need a factory reset after switching to MindTheGapps in my experience, after having had bootloop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a test version of 12. I tried that one. But still, that isn't right. You need 12.1.

Manually uninstalling and disabling corrupt gapps did the trick. I downloaded Play store apk and installed it. After updates everything running smooth again.

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

My Pro1 is currently on its way, and I'm curious if LineageOS is right for me. Mostly because I'm pretty strict in not giving data to Google when it's not absolutely necessary.

 

My usage:

I'm currently using a BB Priv, which is stuck at Android 6, and I'm noticing problems using apps I'd like to have available.

I'm not a heavy app user, but do use them for stuff like online banking, 2FA, etc, which are generally pretty strict in their requirements. 

 

From what I've found researching this, pretty much all apps should be able to run with the right settings, most notably installing Gapps and Magisk. Is that (still) correct?

 

I don't have much experience poking under the hood of Android, but plenty of experience with programming, Unix and microcontrollers, so I'm confident I can figure it out. But I want to make sure if doing that will result in a phone I'm happy with, or if my needs simply match up better with 'stock' Android.

 

And of course: If I install Gapps in the first place, does LineageOS even have any advantages over stock Android? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Itsacon said:

My Pro1 is currently on its way,

I assume you mean Pro1X? The ROM mentioned in this thread is NOT for the Pro1X but the Pro1. Though we do expect that there should be one for the Pro1X too soon.

And almost certainly the same considerations on rooting and the like will go for both.

Will keep the ROMs thread updated, so keep an eye out there for new ROMS for the Pro1X.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any LineageOS devs reading here as well? I build LAOS myself (with very few modifications) and I would like to get started. Is there any way to get early access to the current work in progress Pro1X version? I'm happy to help with testing once my Pro1X arrives next week

Edited by dicer
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, dicer said:

Any LineageOS devs reading here as well? I build LAOS myself (with very few modifications) and I would like to get started. Is there any way to get early access to the current work in progress Pro1X version? I'm happy to help with testing once my Pro1X arrives next week

I think I have seen a github link somewhere in here, but could remember wrong....

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/1/2022 at 5:29 AM, EskeRahn said:

(lineage-19.1-20220801-nightly-pro1-signed.zip on July 5 security patch installed smoothly using adb sideload and MindTheGapps-12.1.0-arm64-20220605_174313)

What recovery are you using to flash this? I tried lineage recovery to flash MindTheGapps-12.1.0-arm64-20220605_174313  after I flashed lineage-19.1-20220801-nightly-pro1-signed.zip but it gives me:

This package is for Android 12.1.0 (SDK 32) but your system is Android 9 (SDK28)! Aborting

Edited by Zuffle
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Zuffle said:

What recovery are you using to flash this? I

I use the one linked next to the large zip here:
https://download.lineageos.org/pro1

I always download both (it is quite small), though they are not identical, I expect they might work within he same android version ,

I use a batchfil to remember the right steps. See the comment here
https://community.fxtec.com/topic/3207-various-roms-available-to-the-pro1pro1x-available-for-download-links/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/5/2022 at 10:12 AM, EskeRahn said:

I assume you mean Pro1X? The ROM mentioned in this thread is NOT for the Pro1X but the Pro1. Though we do expect that there should be one for the Pro1X too soon.

And almost certainly the same considerations on rooting and the like will go for both.

Will keep the ROMs thread updated, so keep an eye out there for new ROMS for the Pro1X.

Ah, I missed that difference1

Thanks for the warning. I fear that means I'll stick with Android for now, unless the ROM is released today or tomorrow 😞

 

1 This is why naming is important boys. Why the X? There is a number in the name. Call it the Pro2!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Itsacon said:

1 This is why naming is important boys. Why the X? There is a number in the name. Call it the Pro2!

The Pro1X was PLANNED to be a Pro1 eXtended with more ram, and changed key-layouts....
But after they were swindled, they had to redo the whole thing with a different chipset, and this is why the old code was supposed to have worked (almost) unchanged on the planned Pro1X, but will not work at all on the actual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(lineage-19.1-20220808-nightly-pro1-signed.zip on July 5 security patch installed smoothly using adb sideload and MindTheGapps-12.1.0-arm64-20220605_174313)

Still with the keyboard bug introduced that messes accessibility apps (works on AICP R/S based on Android 11/12) see e.g. this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EskeRahn said:

The Pro1X was PLANNED to be a Pro1 eXtended with more ram, and changed key-layouts....
But after they were swindled, they had to redo the whole thing with a different chipset, and this is why the old code was supposed to have worked (almost) unchanged on the planned Pro1X, but will not work at all on the actual.

Extended or maybe eXclusive as it was planned to be only one manufacturing run in a special colour and yes, there were special options.
Anyway, I don't know if original plan was needed software modification or not, but if so, it should had been only a slight modification which would also be running on Pro1, so practically it is close to nothing.

Because of a redesign was necessary, unfortunately, it has caused also software incompatibility.

I would not think higher amount of RAM and Flash were intended to be exclusive for Pro1-X but blue colour is.
(Pro1 was practically prepared for higher amount of RAM and Flash and there is a chance if these ICs were replaced, it would work without software modification.)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms