Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/16/2022 in all areas

  1. Dear Community, I have just received my Pro¹X yesterday (photoed near a Pro¹): Its build quality is absolutely perfect, it has no rattling effect, buttons are even and not too loose (similar to Pro¹). Its colour is good - I like original black colour but this deep blue also looks good. I see there is some room for improvement at software side (and I have not used it extensively), but so far I don't see its radios are significantly worse than Pro¹'s radios (however, there are some improvements yet to be done). I feel keyboard's backlight is different - either Pr
    8 points
  2. Sorry, we'll just have to agree to disagree. Where you see "intentional false information," I see overly-optimistic estimations, which, when they don't pan out, they get beat over the head with it. No wonder they kept communication less frequent until they got close to a real production phase. And of course hardware "quirks" would affect software, if the software has to use that hardware that is being fixed. My guess would be a that pre-production models went out in June. I don't know this, but that seems to be about when hardware tweaking was mostly done and the big concern was g
    6 points
  3. This has been done here by others indeed (namely @claude0001and you for Android/Lineage, and others and I did it for Sailfish and Droidian too, but I believe I'm the one who used it the most on those two OSes: https://youtu.be/-dgD5jci8Dk, https://youtu.be/8PnDZtKzsSc, https://youtu.be/rgxrJj37xOs). To some extent, running a custom WM onto Droidian (the host, not a LXC container) is feasible too. I have a Pro1 running Droidian with both Phosh and Sway (plus my i3wm container too), but there's a significant issue on the Sway side because the resolution is twice smaller unless I set scaling
    5 points
  4. Nice! I just received my Pro1X (Black/6GB/128GB) yesterday, just unboxed it today and still haven't played with it much yet. I do have the original Pro1 and used the hell out of the thing. I installed SFOS, an Arch Linux ARM container and some apps, it's one of my favorite Linux PDA.
    5 points
  5. Sadly there's nothing fully working yet, and it's hard to know the status of things that were promising. - Kholk/Angelo showed very encouraging progress with mainline on the Pro1 (msm8998) more than 1.5 years ago, but then I didn't see more news about it or instructions (but we may have to check his commit history somewhere?): - Then, as @claude0001mentioned, @Danct12managed to boot Arch ARM on Pro1, but I think it's stalled and he is not working on it anymore (due to touch noise that mainline doesn't dampen): - And then, the same @Danct12 ported postmarketOS to
    5 points
  6. How about the approach of running some kind of Linux using Termux and PRoot, like AnLinux? You don't even need a rooted Android. I quickly tried a minimal setup of AnLinux (minimal Ubuntu + Xfce) which installed in a few seconds and does look like fun, except that after first install it doesn't come in native resolution and the RealVNC viewer I've used here (it uses VNC to display itself) doesn't seem too user-friendly, either, at least not at first glance.
    4 points
  7. I've seen other benchmarks which, all in all, attested the SD 662 only slightly lower performance compared to the SD 835. From that I would expect to hardly notice any difference at all in actual use, perhaps with the exception of a rare app that heavily uses one of the operations for which the difference is more significant. On the other hand, that's only the CPU; the GPU is substantially slower indeed. Still, as of now, the Pro1 X doesn't feel any less snappy to me than my old Pro1. But then again, except maybe for the BB PRIV, I never used anything but midrange phones which always performed
    3 points
  8. @VaZsogreat to see! Thanks for the longish first impressions! Can confirm, the built quality is excellent imo Kudos to @Erik btw for designing that awesome animated bootsplash logo. Care to share what format you used and where you pushed it to 😅 I could try make one for SailfishOS and UB.
    3 points
  9. Nice comparison, and good looking Pro1 (I bet it's a spare)! Thanks @VaZso.
    3 points
  10. More ram, new camera-chip, an over three years newer chipset that will get security updates, and a two major versions newer Android too.... For many that alone says update. My daily driver has since 2019 been a retail Pro1 on stock android. And when I get the retail Pro1X as I perked for, I expect it to take over, and demote the Pro1 to tests (and as a backup device) But sure for some power hungry tasks the Pro1X is slower. But for a lot of tasks the difference is minor. Not unusual that an older flagship is close to a newer midrange chip. Have a look at e.g. this https://nanoreview.
    3 points
  11. Adam helped me to get Waydroid to work! And shadow.tech works in Waydroid (no sound nor keyboard, though, so it's somewhat limited): See how to get Waydroid to run on SFOS and what doesn't work: https://github.com/sailfish-on-fxtecpro1/droid-config-halium-qx1050/issues/1#issuecomment-1215734546 The current list of issues after just one hour of use: Camera doesn't work (who cares? But it shows that some hardware is not visible to Waydroid) Vibration does not work Landscape rotation is borked (it just stretches ev
    3 points
  12. If you want to run mainline Linux out of principle, I totally respect that. 👍 But, on the practical side: what do you think you would miss if you ran your favourite GNU distro in a container of Android, Sailfish or UBTouch, as proposed by @matf-kabouik or @Rob. S.? Many think of an Android/Lineage chroot or an UBTouch/Sailfish LXC as an "emulator" or a "virtual machine", and therefore have the gut feeling that any software installed in such environments would not be "really" running on their phone. That its speed of execution would be slower compared to the "host OS". That it would s
    2 points
  13. I noticed another small difference the Pro1x is ~10g lighter and way less slippery than the Pro1.
    2 points
  14. Small clarification, you can just take any Pro¹ or Elephone U/Pro fitted protector since the display of our Pro¹-X is exactly the same. Protectionfilm24/Schutzfolien24 @Hooklinked above just reacted fastest to my information that the Pro¹ foil they cut fits. As i could try having a spare Brotec foil for the Pro¹ around and applied it to the Pro¹-X. Same perfect fit. The Elephone U/Pro search will likely even bring up tempered glass screensavers. Those have never been marketed for the Pro¹. But fit nicely, again due to exactly the same display unit. But i am not a fan of those, imo they br
    2 points
  15. If I recall right @tdm and a few other did the LineageOS 16 for the Pro1 before going public, though they at some point showed some test-versions, see this
    2 points
  16. ...and not necessarily hosted at GitHub or GitLab... Sometimes it is better to filter unnecessary "noises" around a project till a point it needs more testing and it may have more contributors after a specific point of development...
    2 points
  17. Pretty sure I read that somewhere from someone who would know. Fortunately we have a Pro1x preorderer who seems to be able to work on mainline too, and even if Angelo is independent again, he might still want to work towards mainlining both devices (after all his work on msm8998 was long before F(x)tec said he was part of the team), so all hope is not lost.
    2 points
  18. I'm seeing it as well (thought it was just me!) It doesn't appear to be at a consistent time, so it being stopped or crashing is something I'll try to look into when it next happens.
    2 points
  19. The closer you can get to Linux in the way you mean it, currently, is Droidian, which is like Mobian but based on the Android kernel.. They already have a port working, which I aim to test later this week. But no news on mainline yet. Techwizz on the Discord is motivated to work on it, but it's a huge task so I don't know how far they can get alone. I believe Angelo no longer works officially for F(x)tec, but don't know what is the reason for that. I heard he is in an community dev group though, but no idea if he is active at the moment.
    2 points
  20. Anyway, I have just received my Pro1X which should be a very early one of IGG orders and it has a serial number somewhat above 5000 which may mean (if they are not numbering inconsistently or randomly inside batches) it may be near 5000 Pro1s (or let's say more than 4000) around the world... or may not if the numbering does not reflect the queue.
    2 points
  21. I had this problem while traveling on a highway at one direction near a specific place several times but not always. Since a point in time I did not experience these spontaneous reboots maybe after one of the stock upgrades but definitively not since I use LineageOS on my Pro1. Anyway, I have received my Pro1X today - I plan to write something about it but basically it is well assembled, however, I feel stock system still needs improving. ...it remembers me of Pro1's stock system like the way the screen does not come up well on Pro1X after moving the phone off my head for example..
    2 points
  22. No one will have experience with those, as the Pro1-X was released only a few days ago. For the Pro1, some success in mainlining has been made, resulting in (as far as I know) a PostmarketOS proof-of-principle. However, as the Pro1-X ended up being a totally different machine, nothing of that is likely portable easily. On the bright side, F(x)tec hired a software engineer specifically to help in mainlining the Pro1-X (and also the original Pro1, I guess). The Pro1 and Pro1-X are not even using the same kernel, so even in the (standardized) x86-world, this would not be possibl
    2 points
  23. Hey F(x)tec community! We thought it would be a great idea to invite Pro1-X owners to come join our beta testing scheme! We know our stock Operating System still needs optimising and requires further development, we believe with the help from our community members, it could speed up the progress of finding and fixing bugs/issues to provide you with a better user experience. Therefore, we created a Telegram group dedicated for users who are interested in testing new Android builds. Anyone with a Pro1-X will be eligible to participate in this programme. However, before you go ahea
    2 points
  24. This is the complete guide on how to flash the stock ROM on your Pro1-X. We will be using the Qualcomm Image Flash Loader (QFIL) inside the Qualcomm Product Support Tools (QPST) pack to flash our XML-based stock firmware. Whether you want to restore your Pro1-X back to factory settings or fix a ‘bricked’ device, flashing the stock ROM back to your Pro1-X using Emergency Download Mode (EDL) with QPST/QFIL is the safest method. However, this process ONLY works on Windows PC. If you do not own a Windows Operating System computer, you may consider setting up a Virtual Machine (VM) on you
    2 points
  25. I am in the early stages of tracking something very strange indeed. I've been getting alerts for a few days from my own internal network monitoring (Nagios) that my primary wifi AP is often dropping packets on its ethernet interface. Since I've been busy with other things (not the least of which is the Pro1-X itself), and the packet loss isn't enough to cause problems, I didn't look into the situation carefully until last night. Once I pulled up my reachability graphs, I realised that the issues seem to have started at exactly the same time I received the Pro1-X: There are a c
    1 point
  26. Thanks to @mosen, this link... https://www.protectionfilms24.com/article/2x-brotect-flex-full-cover-screen-protectorfxtec-pro-1-x-5145664.html
    1 point
  27. You may also check if your Pro¹X stays in landscape mode when the keyboard is open while you rotating the device.
    1 point
  28. I moved the comparisons over to separate thread here
    1 point
  29. Firstly, congratz! The backlight should auto switch on and off when you slide the keyboard from android build 2.1.0 on. Check in the bottom most settings item for the build number. it should say 2.1.2 since that's what the production run was flashed with. In that case, i'd advise to contact [email protected]. If its a lower build number, you could try flashing a newer on. dd`
    1 point
  30. 1 point
  31. To put "for the most parts" into numbers - here is Geekbench5 on a 825 (that is a $400 phone from 2016, the 835 from the initial Pro1 should be ~30% faster) vs. the Pro-1x: single core 825: 326pts pro-1x: 307 oneplus 9 pro: 1075 multi-core 825: 812 pro-1x: 1280 oneplus 9 pro: 3389 compute (opencl) 825: 1610 pro-1x: 381 onplus 9: 3541 samsung galaxy S21: 6990 compute (vulkan): pro-1x: crashed (I tried twice) Regarding "normal use", all I can say after testing for ~2hrs is: build quality is very nice speakers very decent
    1 point
  32. What is the status for the original Pro1 and mainline Linux? Are there guides for setting up a classic Linux (any distribution, I don't care) on the old devices? I received my Pro1-X last week but would kill for a real pocket Linux experience on a keyboard phone (rather than containers on Ubuntu Touch or Sailfish, or Termux or whatever on Android), and I might buy a used Pro1 if I know it can run something like Debian or Ubuntu or Arch.
    1 point
  33. I completely agree that 48MP is unnecessary on such a tiny camera lens. All it would do is fill up flash storage very quickly! Thanks for the interesting post - it was good to learn a few things. And I'm glad that this is actually a decent camera sensor. I was just afraid that when I saw the "48MP" label that maybe it had been swapped for a cheap camera last minute. The label reminded me a lot of the standard fake Chinese specs.
    1 point
  34. ...or around VoLTE / VoWiFi settings. I also had problems on Pro1 when switched mobile data from one card to another (after doing also an Aeroplane mode on/off switch) that the other card started having problems of receiving/initiating a call because it wanted to also use mobile data but otherwise I did not see VoXXX to be working, however, both cards work well when mobile data was switched to the other service provider (only one of my cards support VoXXX). So it also worth looking around this setting as the source of such problems.
    1 point
  35. i think we have to start with a other Point. I use the Phone since Friday with no Problems by making some longer Calls (1 Hour) and my phone rings everytime so no forwarding to the Voicebox. -> Phonecalls are working So i think the problem is to search in the type of Networks. i am located in Germany (Munich) and use Vodafone GSM/WCDMA/LTE With the Data Connection i have some Problems in the underground but this i have with every Phone. I have now made the change described here, And will test it the next days.
    1 point
  36. Great progress, @matf! Is there any way to acquire the Android image linked in that post without using Telegram? I don't have a Telegram account.
    1 point
  37. Just made a test comparing Pro1X to my BB Key2 - on 5 GHz Band. There is some difference, knowing the Key2 is not the best Phone on Wifi. (The stronger connection is the Blackberry) Distance 3 m.
    1 point
  38. I assume you have gone to Settings, apps, Advanced, default apps and specifically set your "Home app" to Nova? I don't usually have to do that with Android 11 and before, but I did have to do it with Lineage 19, so I wonder if Google has changed something up.
    1 point
  39. Never heard of that -- but then I've also never used stock Android 9. I tend to view this anecdote as proof of how much the Pro1-X (too) will leave its initial (software) problems behind once we see LineageOS up and soaring ... Firmware bugs are a different story, of course.
    1 point
  40. Ah yes, how things could have been different had they not been swindled...
    1 point
  41. I ordered this one. I don't know what it will look like and whether it will fit on a rounded side or if it is just a flat sheet. Not yet arrived. I plan to cover the bottom of the device with heat shrink film to prevent scratches and sand particles. I cut out the necessary parts and then put the device in a rubber or silicone case. (maybe P20 Pro)
    1 point
  42. Do you remember: "Yeah, XDA made a phone and it’s only available for 6 weeks! ... and it's the world's first phone to run LineageOS out of the box!" https://www.xda-developers.com/pro1-x/
    1 point
  43. Thanks @toast, yes, it was in the official update. Also, they showed images of the first cameras they received, and they showed '586' in the print on the ribbon cable:
    1 point
  44. Okay, I've tried this out, and no, the process outlined by @Casey does not restore key attestation functionality. I don't need key attestation working on my device anyway, but hopefully there's a solution out there that will provide both working sensors and working key attestation.
    1 point
  45. Dynamic orientation works in LXC even with a tiling WM, thanks to qxcompositor (we were using qxdisplay with harbour-containers since 2020 because at the time qxcompositor didn't support portrait, but qxdisplay doesn't support dynamic changes so the update qxcompositor is now superior): Useful mostly for other devices, but even on Pro1 it can be cool when just consuming content without the keyboard.
    1 point
  46. My E7 is currently 12 years old and its hinge mechanism, which I use a lot, works flawlessly. There are zero signs of anything wearing out - nothing is loose or rattly.
    1 point
  47. Thanks for information and for summarizing this so nicely. I guess, most people are not aware that the typical camera sensor uses only a fraction of its pixels for each of the red, green, and blue colour channels, respectively. I also agree that, at the given size of phone sensors and lenses, and given the high density of a 48-megapixel sensor, just grouping pixels 4-by-4 is likely the most reasonable thing to do, except (maybe) for the most high-end phone cameras. That said, it is also true that, in the days before CCD/CMOS sensors reached today's insanely high pixel densities, demosaici
    1 point
  48. The rear camera is a Sony IMX586. The sensor really has 48 MP, but the full resolution is only used internally, like for AF. This is standard for Quad Bayer layout sensors (the 20 MP, physically 80 MP sensor of the high-end OM System / Olympus OM-1 interchangeable lens camera, for example, has the same design and the same limitation). A full-resolution readout would not make much sense, as the colour matrix only has 12 million colour squares, each one covering an array of 2x2 pixels. (There are few phones with 12/48 MP sensors which make an exception, though, and try to make 48 MP results avai
    1 point
  49. Okay, it looks like this problem actually does not appear after I flash Ubuntu Touch. (I do, however, now have the problem that the screen goes black on UT whenever I close the keyboard, but that's unrelated!) Not sure at this point why I saw such variability on my AP going back to the day I got the Pro1-X. But it does appear that at least the worst examples of the problem are exclusive to Sailfish. I have updated the topic on this post appropriately, and will continue to investigate!
    1 point
  50. Oh of course. My post was intended to be a "helpful hint", not a "waah this doesn't work". 😆
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms