EskeRahn

It does look rather different with the repeated key for Lineage: Versus the two keys on stock android

Again @Raksura has helped forwarding an update:

...Suggestion: Left of the "Cancel" add a "Lock now", can make sense if people have set it a little high, and do not want to wait, before putting it in say the pocket. Of course we can just press the Power, but would make sense next to "Cancel", and Power could have it's own delay, is selected in the standard settings. Have you any news on getting it to work on LineageOS? The sensor here act somewhat different, repeatedly sending a close, and a different key...

Minor bug with new function. If you open&close when locked, and then touch the fingerprint to unlock, it does, and count down to lock again.... (And for some reason sometimes the box is shown slightly smaller without the cancel - I have not been able to spot the pattern)

80% Stroh Rum? (that is 160 for the US public)

I have seen several wishing for that. I remember for my Xperia (Neo) Pro that it was quite handy - but that was at a time where portrait was used primarily for phone calls. But what about some smarter version of that! Lock the display IF you do not interact with he display after close in say 3s (could be same lock time-out slider as the flip close) It could EITHER be implemented by turning the display off, but allowing a Power press to turn it back on OR it could hesitate turning the display off, perhaps with a pop-up count-down. that people could just touch to cancel, say "Locking i

https://xkcd.com/2280/

We will normally have a weaker signal with a phone in the pocket than in the hands (or at a desk), and as the issue seems correlated with a weak signal it will be more common when in a pocket.

I see this too, but to me it is new with Test9-11 (did not see it on 6-8)

A little graph from here on the age distribution of the mortality from China. The numbers are from this report. (attached) COVID-19[1].pdf

As I understood it, it combines the two going forward. I have no idea on the details.

Thanks, Just got confirmed from @Waxberry that the 20200306 is indeed a variant back on September security level, that IS in compliance with CTS / Safetynet (Those of us that updated to 20200304 will have to wait for a later common update - it is finished but awaits to be certified, hopefully in the coming week)

Interesting. I'm not offered that one. Could be that it is an alternative to the suspended one - does it say what it contains? Is it the same list as in the screenshot @FlyingAntero shared earlier here? ADD: I installed the 20200304 stamped patch, manually.

On the first. Adding FinQwerty to me made all the difference in getting a good keyboard experience. On the last, well yes and no. In some countries the consumers have a lot of rights on fraudulent activities, so obviously the banks want to protect themselves against any claims from the consumer that (s)he did not do a specific transaction. And the more secure the platform, the easier it is for them to prove that it actually was you.

I'm pretty sure it (except the very first batch) is sent with an unlockable not an unlocked bootloader. It is only the last OTA that broke the safetynet test.

And a very important factor here is that some will need an Iron lung for a while, but recover completely afterwards. So to the extent this treatment is available the mortality will be lower than if not. So even if the mortality in hindsight shows a low number, a lot of people might have needed the help of the health care system to survive. And this brings us back to the whole purpose of all that various governments are doing is to to stretch the whole thing over time, so the health system will not break down, as it seems to have done locally in northern Italy. So to assess the danger

Unfortunately we do not really know the numbers here. I think those figures are over-optimistic.

The script is just an automatised version of the process @tdm described here. I have compared the boot-images, and they are binary different (I do not know why). (I could have added some echo-text of optionally wiping user data before the first main sideload, to be used when switching from stock, or when you do NOT want an upgrade - e.g. a downgrade from test10 to test9 would require a wipe)

I think it is EXTREMELY optimistic that it should be contained in China, and somehow miraculous will not sieve back from abroad. But of course I HOPE you are right.

Well there are (at the least) three levels Authorized to run the Android Market the "Device is certified" within the Android Market Safetynet So the Lineage pass the first, but not the second (and thus nor the third)

This is NOT about limiting it, it is about STRETCHING it, so fewer are sick at the same time. Most likely almost all of us will get it sooner or later, no matter what.

If I enter settings in the android market and scrolls down, it says "Device is not certified" on lineage Test11

@silversolver I agree to a very large extent. But the point of the current actions of many governments is NOT to claim that it can stop the virus (only fools believe that IMHO). The point is to DELAY the spread. So the few that will need treatment can get the treatment. If a lot get sick at the same time the health system will crash. But if it can be prolonged it is possible. Actually this flu seems to have a rather low mortality, even for the severe cases IF the patient get the iron lung support they need. But that will not be possible to offer if a lot comes in at the same time. T

(Same here in Denmark) 😷🤒🤧

Allow me to suggest rounding, as the 'hooks' will likely have a tendency to get caught in fabric like the a pocket-linning. e.g something like