Doktor Oswaldo

This may help: https://github.com/tdm/android_kernel_idealte_msm8998/blob/lineage-16.0/drivers/input/keyboard/aw9523b.h

Agree let's say it looks hurried, not necessarily unprofessional.... (But you are wrong about the spaghetti code, amateurs can do that 😄 )

Have seen worse. But it is a bit inconsistent and most of the parts seem to be way to complicated. I agree that it does not look very professional but it should be fixable! (Well netman has already done first steps).

I don't have to imagine that...

I figured that out like 8 versions ago 😄 See my updated post

It works like a charm, the problem is that you added the tag inside the quote

Well it is quite useful if you use a password manager (and you should). Typing in your 20+ master pw could be time consuming. However I plan to try it without the fingerprint reader now that I get a keyboard.

Yeah it is horrible, the outsourcing of work into captchas is becoming more and more aggressive. Mine was even worse:

wtf... the website is not a reliable source

Because the pro1 has 64-keys and not 65 ...

So if you optimise English, it becomes sort of Swedish?

What he meant is, his problem is not muscle memory, since he is not used to type on a hwkb-landscape slider (anymore).

It is in my opinion, there are a lot of topics where a smaller screen is discussed (I would personally prefer a smaller screen). The target of this topic was only to discuss the sense of the shift.

This is all true, but the original statement of the thread was not that it is too big, but why the keys are shifted inwards and not outwards. Of course without having my device yet, it is all speculations. Since my hands are on the bigger side too, I also expect no problems, but we will see.

Since this seems all like a lot of work, may I ask you if you have some kind of donation intake? Or would it help if we use the general lineage donation stuff?

I hardly think there would not be enough money for the goodness if they would earn less money from ads. There is enough money for that, just not for shareholders. And that is the point, it always has to go up, yeah they may not sell the data now. But what if the shareholders are not happy any more because google hit the grow-limit? What if the ad economy breaks down? P.S. The point with china is worthless. They tried hard to do a specialized engine for china, only the engineers are not in for it. As any big company they happily help the regime because china is a big market

In most countries no. Here for example the company must at least give you the basic health insurance. However it is not illegal to loss your application sheet, or forget to answer you. Then there are countries like the US where they don't have to insurance you. Sure all this data must be anonymized but we all know how easy you get names out of it.

The really dangerous stuff is: They could sell the data, for example to insurances. Then you can't get a new one, just because you googled some things about a cancer type (could be medical research for school even). Or banks will deny you loans and stuff like that...

Oh I bet you had a hard time after the roses kicked the all blacks out of the competition 😄

Eske works in Databases not software, I bet he says that is something completely different 😄

They depend completely on 3rd parties. It even starts to get more difficult if you have to guess for other developers, or work with their guesses. Also there is not always the possibility to add a big reserve, sometimes you got told to not overestimate it, because getting this project could lead to further more lucrative projects. Guessing is insanely hard if your error margin is gone! Often someone also need to guess stuff he have no idea of and can't spend a week researching that stuff, someone needs to use experience and guts. Managing situations like that is what makes good proje

That is another thing. Yes but as I said before: It is a small team of engineers not marketing guys. They may have a lot of stress and fear over their future. It might be not that easy for them. But yeah they surely should!

No, but I would have if I had to to the guesswork 10 years ago. And my personal financial future was never at that stake theirs must be. Wouldn't you ever had estimated a project way to short? Was there never a printer not working in a critical moment or the network down? Had you never had to wait for a third-party company to finish there part 3 months to late?

It is utterly important to keep critics valid and focused. There is a point where they could do better (communications) and there are a lot of points where it is insanely hard to do better without having a name first. For example the order of the fulfilment. Imagine this: First batch had problems with logistics, it was just to complicated for the partner Since the second batch should be big enough, they told logistics to just forget the order and deliver to anybody on the list. Second batch has a production issue (without a lot of experience this is unlikely to be fore